• Freelance AI app developer
  • Next.js
  • TypeScript
  • Python

AI App Development: LLM-Powered Products and Features That Ship

Open for projectsRemote, worldwideReplies within 48 hours

I'm a freelance AI app developer in India building LLM-powered web apps, RAG tools and AI agents for founders, agencies and product teams worldwide. I built Krillo, a live website-audit tool where Google Gemini turns findings into specific fixes, and I build the whole app around the model: data, interface, guardrails and cost controls.

01Overview

APIs, RAG or a custom model?

Founders often assume the hard part of an AI product is the model. Usually it isn't. Hosted models from Google, Anthropic and OpenAI are already very capable, so the real decision is how to use them: a well-designed prompt against an API, retrieval over your own data, or, occasionally, a fine-tuned model. Training a model from scratch is almost never the right call for a startup. My default in AI app development is to start with the simplest option that passes a test set built from your real inputs, and add complexity only when those tests say it is needed.

If your users ask about your documents, products, policies or records, retrieval matters more than which model you pick. The model has to see that content when it answers, not try to remember it. Doing that well means splitting content sensibly, generating embeddings, storing them in a vector database such as pgvector, Pinecone or Qdrant, retrieving the right passages, respecting who is allowed to see what, and citing sources so people can check the answer. Fine-tuning comes later, if at all. It helps when you need a consistent format or tone on a narrow task and have good labelled examples, and it does not replace retrieval.

Cost and privacy are where AI products tend to get into trouble once real users arrive, so I plan for both from the first prototype. On cost: the smallest model that passes the tests, larger models only for the requests that need them, tight context, caching, output caps and per-user limits, with token usage logged per feature. On privacy: model calls stay on the server, only the fields a task needs are sent, personal data is masked where possible, and I check the data-use terms of the exact API plan you will run on.

Krillo, the website-audit tool I built, follows the same rule of giving the model one narrow job. It isn't asked to find problems on its own: automated checks do that, and Gemini works from their structured findings to suggest specific fixes. Deterministic code where the answer is knowable and a model where judgment is needed is how I approach any AI feature, because it keeps the output checkable.

02Deliverables

What you get

  • 01

    AI features for existing apps

    Summaries, smart search, drafting, classification or data extraction added to the product you already run. LLM calls stay server-side, responses stream into your interface, and usage is logged from day one.

  • 02

    RAG and knowledge-base tools

    Chat and search over your documents, help center, PDFs or product data, with sensible chunking, embeddings, a vector store like pgvector, Pinecone or Qdrant, permission-aware retrieval and citations back to the source.

  • 03

    AI agents and workflows

    Multi-step agents built with LangGraph that call your APIs and tools through function calling or MCP, with clear limits on what they may do and human approval before any risky action.

  • 04

    AI MVPs and AI SaaS

    A complete first version of a product where the model is the core, like Krillo: the AI pipeline plus the interface, accounts, database and reports that make it usable by real customers.

  • 05

    Evaluation and guardrails

    A test set built from your real inputs, structured outputs validated with Zod, fallbacks for when the model fails or times out, and input checks, so prompt and model changes are tested before they ship.

  • 06

    Cost and usage controls

    Model routing, trimmed context, caching, output caps and per-user rate limits, with token spend logged per feature so you can see exactly what each part of the product costs to run.

03Fit

Is this a fit?

Who this is for

  • Founders with an AI product idea who need a working version real users can try
  • SaaS teams that want AI search, summaries or an assistant inside their existing product
  • Companies with documents, tickets or knowledge bases that their team or customers struggle to search
  • Agencies that need a dependable developer to build the AI part of a client project
  • Operations teams that want repetitive multi-step work handled by an agent with human checkpoints

Built with

  • Next.js
  • TypeScript
  • Python
  • Gemini API
  • Anthropic API
  • LangChain
  • LangGraph
  • LlamaIndex
  • PostgreSQL + pgvector
  • MCP

Not sure it's the right fit? Tell me what you're building and I'll say so honestly.

Send a brief

04Process

How it works

  1. 1

    Use-case call

    You get a reply within 48 hours, then a short call to pin down what the AI should do, what data it will touch and what a good answer looks like for your users.

  2. 2

    Model, data and cost plan

    Before any work starts, I send a written plan on model choice, retrieval approach, data handling and how API costs will scale, with a fixed-scope quote attached.

  3. 3

    Prototype on real data

    I build the core AI flow first and run it against examples from your business, so we judge real outputs early and settle prompts, retrieval and model choice before the full interface exists.

  4. 4

    Build and harden

    Then comes the product around it: streaming interface, auth, database, guardrails, evaluation runs, usage limits and logging. You can test progress yourself at each milestone.

  5. 5

    Launch and hand over

    I deploy, document the prompts, data flows and test sets, and hand everything over. You own the code and the API and database accounts, and I can stay on for improvements if you want.

06Why me

Why work with me

AI already in production

Krillo is live, and its Gemini step runs on whatever site someone submits, not a curated demo set, so its fixes have to be specific enough to act on. I build for what happens after the demo.

AI is my field of study

I'm doing a B.Tech in AI at Newton School of Technology, Rishihood University, and I work hands-on with RAG, LangChain, LangGraph, LlamaIndex, MCP and vector databases. I pick tools for the problem, not the trend.

Full-stack, not just prompts

The model is a small part of an AI app. I also build the Next.js front end, database, auth, payments and deployment, as on Maison Rivina, so one person is accountable for the whole product.

07FAQ

Questions, answered

How much does it cost to build an AI app?

There's no fixed price until the use case is clear, so I send a written fixed-scope quote after a short call. What moves the price in AI app development is whether it is a feature in an existing app or a new product, whether it needs RAG over your data and how messy that data is, how many tools an agent must use, and the quality bar. Model API usage is a separate running cost paid to the provider, and the plan explains how it scales.

Do I need to train my own model to build an AI product?

Almost certainly not. Hosted models from Google, Anthropic and OpenAI handle most text and reasoning tasks well with good prompts and structured outputs. When answers depend on your own content, RAG adds that knowledge at query time. Fine-tuning is worth considering only when you need a consistent format or tone on a narrow task and have good labelled examples. Training from scratch is a research project, not a first product step.

Which LLM should I use: OpenAI, Gemini or Claude?

Use the one that passes your test cases at the lowest cost and latency, which is why I test before committing. All three are strong, and the differences show up per task: long documents, tool use, structured output, speed, price and data terms. Krillo runs on Gemini, and I also build with the Anthropic API. I keep model calls behind a thin layer in your code, so switching providers later means re-running the tests, not rewriting the app.

What is RAG, and does my product need it?

RAG, or retrieval-augmented generation, means finding the relevant pieces of your own content and giving them to the model with the question, so answers come from your data instead of the model's memory. You need it if users ask about your documents, products, policies or records, or if that content changes often. You don't need it for generic tasks like rewriting text or classifying tickets. Good RAG is mostly about chunking, retrieval quality, permissions and showing sources.

How long does it take to build an AI MVP?

That depends mostly on your data and your quality bar, and the written plan you get before work starts includes a timeline with milestones. The biggest variables are how ready your data is, how many systems the AI has to connect to, and how many rounds of testing it takes to reach acceptable answers. Because I prototype the core AI flow on real examples first, you see actual outputs early instead of waiting for the full build to judge the idea.

Can you add AI features to my existing website or app?

Yes, and it is often the quickest way to get value from AI. I add LLM calls on the server side of your current stack, whether that is Next.js, React with a Node.js or Express backend, or a Python service. API keys never reach the browser, responses stream into your interface, and usage is logged. If your app runs on a stack I'm less suited to, I'll read the codebase first and tell you plainly.

How do you keep AI API costs under control?

I design for cost from the start instead of reacting to the first large invoice. That means using the smallest model that passes your tests, sending only hard requests to larger models, retrieving the relevant passages rather than whole documents, caching repeated answers, capping output length and rate-limiting each user. Token usage is logged per feature, and I set spend limits or budget alerts wherever the provider supports them, so a spike shows up before the invoice does.

Is my data safe when using LLM APIs?

It can be, if the system is designed for it. Paid API plans from the major providers generally state that they do not train on your requests by default, but terms vary by plan and free tiers can differ, so I check the exact plan you will use. I send only the fields a task needs, mask personal data where possible, keep calls server-side, store embeddings in your own database and enforce permissions at retrieval. If data must never leave your servers, we can discuss self-hosted open-weight models.

Who owns the code, prompts and AI accounts?

You do, including the parts specific to AI. Model API keys, the vector database and hosting sit under your own accounts, so nothing depends on me to keep running. Prompts, evaluation test sets and notes on why each prompt is written the way it is are part of the handover, so another developer can change them safely. If you'd like me to keep improving the product after launch, post-launch support can be arranged.

Still have a question?

Ask me directly. I reply within 48 hours.

Let's Build Something

Tell me what you're building. I'll reply personally with how I'd approach it.

Open for freelance projectsReplies within 48 hours

Prefer email? Skip the form

What do you need?Pick any that apply. Optional.
Tell me about it

AI product: What should the AI actually do, what data does it work with, and does it plug into an existing product?

Timeline(Optional)

Not sure yet? Leave it blank and we'll work it out together.

Where do I reply?

I reply within 48 hours. Your details are only used to get back to you.